<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bankruptcy Lawyer Indiana &#187; Chapter 11</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bankruptcy-lawyer-indiana.com/blog/category/chapter-11/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bankruptcy-lawyer-indiana.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 02:38:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Chapters 7, 11 and 13 Debtors Must List All Debts To Obtain a Discharge of Those Debts</title>
		<link>http://www.bankruptcy-lawyer-indiana.com/blog/2009/10/04/chapters-7-11-and-13-debtors-must-list-all-debts-to-obtain-a-discharge-of-those-debts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bankruptcy-lawyer-indiana.com/blog/2009/10/04/chapters-7-11-and-13-debtors-must-list-all-debts-to-obtain-a-discharge-of-those-debts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 21:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jschreiber</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chapter 11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 13]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy practice and procedure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bankruptcy-lawyer-indiana.com/blog/?p=84</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What obligations does a bankruptcy discharge cover?  During the past 20 years, the common practice among bankruptcy lawyers has been to assure debtors in no asset bankruptcy cases&#8211;cases in which there are not any non-exempt assets available for distribution to creditors&#8211;that even if the debtor failed to list a creditor on his schedules, the obligation [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What obligations does a bankruptcy discharge cover?  During the past 20 years, the common practice among bankruptcy lawyers has been to assure debtors in no asset bankruptcy cases&#8211;cases in which there are not any non-exempt assets available for distribution to creditors&#8211;that even if the debtor failed to list a creditor on his schedules, the obligation will be discharged. This practice arose from a no harm, no foul reading of Bankruptcy Code section 523.</p>
<p>The federal bankruptcy rules permit a bankruptcy court in no asset cases to choose not to fix a bar date in which proofs of claim must be filed. Thus, courts adopting the no harm, no foul reasoning found that there was no date in which to timely file the proof of claim and therefore no triggering of Bankruptcy Code section 523(a)(3)(A). See, e.g., In re Beezley, 994 F.2d 1433, 1435-37 (9th Cir. 1993).</p>
<p>Recently, however, the First Circuit Court of Appeals rejected this reasoning, and held that even in a no asset case, if a debt or claim is not scheduled, then the debt is not discharged absent a reopening of the bankruptcy case.</p>
<p>The court&#8217;s reasoning in Colonial Surety Co. v. Weizman, 564 F.3d 526 (1st Cir. 2009), is based upon the equities of the situation. Providing notice, even in a no asset case, allows creditors to participate in the case and to argue that there may be assets available. An honest debtor can still have the debt discharged if he asks the bankruptcy court to reopen the case to list the creditor who was inadvertantly omitted and who would have received no benefit from the initial notice. This properly leaves the burden squarely on the debtor&#8217;s shoulders to disclose the debt or to explain why it was omitted.</p>
<p>The court appears to protect the institutional integrity of the bankruptcy court so that debtors can not argue that it doesn&#8217;t make any difference anyway. Creditors and parties in interest, by this decision, are being afforded a modicum of due process and an opportunity to be heard even in no asset bankruptcy cases.</p>
<p>The lesson to learn from Weizman is to include every possible claim or debt against a debtor on the bankruptcy schedules. We always advise clients to err on the side of over disclosure. Even if a debtor isn&#8217;t sure whether a particular debt has been paid or is still owed, we advise the debtor to list the claim. The debtor can always list the creditor as holding a disputed claim. However, by the Colonial Surety case, if a debtor inadvertantly omits a creditor from his bankruptcy filng, it becomes expensive later to move to reopen the case and amend the debtor&#8217;s schedules.</p>
<p>Claims that are omitted from the schedules may later be discharged but only after the debtor pays to reopen the case and only provided that the debtor can prove the omission was inadvertant and otherwise innocent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bankruptcy-lawyer-indiana.com/blog/2009/10/04/chapters-7-11-and-13-debtors-must-list-all-debts-to-obtain-a-discharge-of-those-debts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Business Restructuring Alternatives to Chapter 11</title>
		<link>http://www.bankruptcy-lawyer-indiana.com/blog/2009/09/14/business-restructuring-alternatives-to-chapter-11/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bankruptcy-lawyer-indiana.com/blog/2009/09/14/business-restructuring-alternatives-to-chapter-11/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jschreiber</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chapter 11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business restructuring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assignment for benefit of creditors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[composition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insolvency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bankruptcy-lawyer-indiana.com/blog/2009/09/14/business-restructuring-alternatives-to-chapter-11/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chapter 11 is the business reorganization section of the Bankruptcy Code.  Sometimes Chapter 11 must be applied to an ailing business so that it can continue operations while reorganizing.  Other times, alternatives to Chapter 11 may be applied that are less expensive and yet just as effective to reorganize a business.
Since last year, the housing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chapter 11 is the business reorganization section of the Bankruptcy Code.  Sometimes Chapter 11 must be applied to an ailing business so that it can continue operations while reorganizing.  Other times, alternatives to Chapter 11 may be applied that are less expensive and yet just as effective to reorganize a business.</p>
<p>Since last year, the housing bubble burst. The Dow fell over 6,500 points. The commercial credit markets rendered borrowing almost impossible. Lenders, who once competed over loans, are now declining everyone except for the most creditworthy borrowers. Consumers are starting to save, just when the government needs them to spend. As cash becomes scarce and loans become due, businesses need to assess their options.</p>
<p>Chapter 11 is still the first option that most decision-makers think of when grappling with an insolvency situation in their business. Still, that is appropriate. Bankruptcy offers features that are unavailable anywhere else. Under Chapter 11, debtors are afforded the automatic stay, the ability to reject burdensome contracts, and the power to impose a plan that most constituents agree upon and bind holdouts to the deal. These are powerful tools and bankruptcy is often the best, if not the only viable, option for some companies. But bankruptcy should not be the only option that businesses consider. The market for debtor in possession (&#8220;DIP&#8221;) financing has become scarce. Even when DIP financing is available, its pricing has increased and the usual term of the loan has been shortened.</p>
<p>If a company does not need the tools tafforded under the bankruptcy laws, there may be faster, less expensive, ways to reorganize or liquidate. This is especially true for smaller businesses.</p>
<p>For businesses that need to reorganize while continuing their operations, a composition may be attractive. A composition is simply an agreement between a company and its creditors to restructure the company&#8217;s debt. If it can be achieved, it can be quick, quiet, and less expensive than Chapter 11. The main obstacle to a composition&#8217;s success is the holdout. If one or more creditors refuse to compromise their claims, a composition does not offer a way to compel them to accept it. Everyone else takes a haircut, while the holdout keeps its full claim and reaps the benefit of an improved balance sheet for its borrower. Of course, that doesn&#8217;t sound fair. Well, compositions work only in situations where few creditors hold the majority of the company&#8217;s debt.</p>
<p>Shareholders and/or management who need to liquidate a company and provide a cost effective way for creditors to get the proceeds of liquidation have at least two non-bankruptcy options. First, the company&#8217;s management can oversee the company&#8217;s own liquidation subject to relevant state corporations law and &#8220;Going out of Business&#8221; statutes, if relevant. Second, they can use an assignment for the benefit of creditors (&#8220;ABC&#8221;), if the company is located in a state that offers an acceptable ABC process.</p>
<p>Under an ABC, the company chooses an assignee and conveys its assets to the person or entity to conduct that liquidation. Indiana boasts a favorable ABC statute but, interestingly, it is little used by insolvency lawyers. It&#8217;s one of Indiana&#8217;s best kept secrets!</p>
<p>Once the assignment is perfected, the assignee, not the company or its officers, directors, or shareholders, is responsible for the unpleasant tasks that accompany liquidation, like telling creditors that they will not be paid in full. It does allow, however, the company to choose its liquidator.</p>
<p>In contrast, in bankruptcy court, a trustee or a creditors&#8217; committee is often perceived as always looking for someone to sue, to place blame for a corporate failure. And, while an assignee also has a duty to investigate potential causes of action, assignees are less likely to bring speculative suits viewed more as shakedowns than anything else.</p>
<p>Creditors of a company that undertakes an ABC are often satisfied that a third party is overseeing the liquidation. Moreover, the creditors will enjoy a larger recovery than would be otherwise available in a bankruptcy because of an ABC&#8217;s significantly reduced costs, including reduced professional fees.</p>
<p>ABC laws vary from state to state, and in some states an ABC is not a viable option. Many practitioners are unfamiliar with the process. I&#8217;ve served many times both as an assignee in an ABC and as bankruptcy trustee so this firm has ample experience in both of these types of proceedings. Where they fit, ABC&#8217;s offer significant advantages over bankruptcy.</p>
<p>While many situations, especially those involving companies with public securities, large numbers of executory contracts or unexpired leases, assets in multiple states, or union, pension, or mass tort liabilities require the supervision of a bankruptcy judge under Chapter 11, many other situations do not. You should understand all available alternatives before choosing the right one for your company&#8217;s situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bankruptcy-lawyer-indiana.com/blog/2009/09/14/business-restructuring-alternatives-to-chapter-11/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Avoiding Chapter 7, Chapter 11, or Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Can Be a Mistake</title>
		<link>http://www.bankruptcy-lawyer-indiana.com/blog/2009/09/13/avoiding-chapter-7-chapter-11-or-chapter-13-bankruptcy-can-be-a-mistake/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bankruptcy-lawyer-indiana.com/blog/2009/09/13/avoiding-chapter-7-chapter-11-or-chapter-13-bankruptcy-can-be-a-mistake/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 02:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jschreiber</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chapter 11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 13]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bankruptcy-lawyer-indiana.com/blog/2009/09/13/avoiding-chapter-7-chapter-11-or-chapter-13-bankruptcy-can-be-a-mistake/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Often, the first thing a prospective client says in a client meeting is that &#8220;I don&#8217;t want to be here and filing for bankruptcy relief is the last thing I ever wanted to do.&#8221; I&#8217;m sympathetic always. My response is usually words to the effect : &#8220;Yet, here you are so let&#8217;s analyze the problem.&#8221;
Depite [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Often, the first thing a prospective client says in a client meeting is that &#8220;I don&#8217;t want to be here and filing for bankruptcy relief is the last thing I ever wanted to do.&#8221; I&#8217;m sympathetic always. My response is usually words to the effect : &#8220;Yet, here you are so let&#8217;s analyze the problem.&#8221;</p>
<p>Depite the fact that a client may have little or no equity in his home (if he owns one), and despite the fact that the client does not have any assets that can be marshalled by a trustee in bankruptcy, the client still has a negative opinion about the word &#8220;bankruptcy.&#8221;</p>
<p>What I usually say is that bankruptcy makes more sense than decimating retirement accounts and depleting other assets otherwise protected under the bankruptcy laws. The federal bankruptcy laws enacted by Congress are uniform throughout the United States. Consequently, wherever you exercise your rights under the laws, the same statute applies subject to certain state law exemptions.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, when people are in real trouble, they often wait too long to get the relief they need. Bankruptcy is designed to afford folks with a fresh start when no other reasonable alternative exists.</p>
<p>Discharging debts and moving on with your life is often the smartest move a burdened consumer can choose. To those who qualify, Chapter 7 relief discharges most debts. A Chapter 7 discharge generally discharges credit card debts, medical bills, personal loans, and other unsecured debts.</p>
<p>For those who need to stop a foreclosure proceeding or sheriff&#8217;s sale, Chapter 13 enables the consumer to pay some or all of his debts through a payment plan but still being afforded protection under the automatic stay provisions of the Code.</p>
<p>Some prospective clients say they need to avoid bankruptcy because they think they have perfect credit. These folks, respectfully, are usually fooling themselves. When one has overwhelming debt, one&#8217;s credit isn&#8217;t perfect at all. In fact, one may be making timely minimum monthly payments on credit card and other debts, but I explain, if one now applies to a lender for additional loans, one&#8217;s application will be rejected based upon the amount of the prospective borrower&#8217;s existing debt compared to his income.</p>
<p>The first step to moving towards a debt free future is meeting with an experienced bankruptcy attorney. Our offices provide free, confidential consultations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bankruptcy-lawyer-indiana.com/blog/2009/09/13/avoiding-chapter-7-chapter-11-or-chapter-13-bankruptcy-can-be-a-mistake/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chapters 7, 11, or 13: How Quickly will Creditors Stop Calling?</title>
		<link>http://www.bankruptcy-lawyer-indiana.com/blog/2009/09/07/chapters-7-11-or-13-if-i-file-bankruptcy-how-quickly-will-creditors-stop-calling-me-or-my-business/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bankruptcy-lawyer-indiana.com/blog/2009/09/07/chapters-7-11-or-13-if-i-file-bankruptcy-how-quickly-will-creditors-stop-calling-me-or-my-business/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 23:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jschreiber</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chapter 11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 13]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bankruptcy-lawyer-indiana.com/blog/2009/09/07/chapters-7-11-or-13-if-i-file-bankruptcy-how-quickly-will-creditors-stop-calling-me-or-my-business/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When any bankruptcy petition is filed, a powerful federal law immediately cloaks the debtor with protection from creditors. The protection is a federal injunction known as the automatic stay. The automatic stay is a stay of all collection actions against the debtor including, but not limited to, phone calls, dunning by letter or any other [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When any bankruptcy petition is filed, a powerful federal law immediately cloaks the debtor with protection from creditors. The protection is a federal injunction known as the automatic stay. The automatic stay is a stay of all collection actions against the debtor including, but not limited to, phone calls, dunning by letter or any other communication, collection lawsuits, foreclosures, repossessions, and other types of litigation. In other words, the stay prohibits any creditor from taking any action to collect a debt.</p>
<p>The minute your petition is filed, the law requires that debt collectors stop calling you. It could take a few days for creditors to receive notice of the filing which is mailed by the bankruptcy court.</p>
<p>If a creditor or creditor&#8217;s representative calls you after the bankruptcy petition is filed, you need to tell him that you filed for bankruptcy relief and give him the bankruptcy court case number and location.</p>
<p>Once clients retain our law firm, we direct them to tell their creditors they have retained our law firm.  Clients should give the creditors our telephone number. After that information is provided, the creditors are not permitted by law to contact the debtor again, unless the attorney/client arrangement dissolves, or if the debtor does not file for bankruptcy relief within a few months. If a creditor continues to contact the debtor, after the creditor learns that an attorney has been involved, the creditor violates the federal Fair Debt Collections Practices Act.  Consequently, the debtor has remedies against the creditor.</p>
<p>Once creditors know that their customer has retained counsel, they do not continue to call. Thus, once you retain our law firm, you will receive certain important and valuable protections immediately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bankruptcy-lawyer-indiana.com/blog/2009/09/07/chapters-7-11-or-13-if-i-file-bankruptcy-how-quickly-will-creditors-stop-calling-me-or-my-business/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
